home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- WHO ARE THE MEN IN BLACK?
-
- From 'The Unexplained' No. 10. Orbis Publishing. 1991.
-
- As UFO sightings increase, so allegedly does the harassment
- of witnesses - by the sinister so-called Men In Black.
-
- Albert Bender, director of the International Flying Saucer
- Bureau, an amateur organization based in Connecticut, USA, once
- claimed to have discovered the secret behind UFOs. But
- unfortunately, the rest of the world is still none the wiser -
- for Bender was prevented from passing on his discovery to the
- world by three sinister visitors: three men dressed in black,
- known as 'the silencers'.
- It had been Bender's intention to publish his findings in
- his own journal, Space Review. But before committing himself
- finally, he felt he ought to try his ideas out on a colleague.
- He therefore mailed his report. A few days later, the men came.
- Bender was lying down in his bedroom, overtaken by a sudden
- spell of dizziness, when he noticed three shadowy figures in the
- room. Gradually, they became clearer. All were dressed in black
- clothes. "They looked like clergymen, but wore hats similar to
- Homburg style. The faces were not clearly discernible, for the
- hats partly hid and shaded them. Feelings of fear left me... The
- eyes of all three figures suddenly lit up like flashlight bulbs,
- and all these were focussed upon me. They seemed to burn into my
- very soul as the pains above my eyes became almost unbearable.
- It was then I sensed that they were conveying a message to me by
- telelathy."
-
- Bender's visitors confirmed that he had been right in his
- speculations as to the true nature of the UFOs - one of them was
- actually carrying Bender's report, and provided additional
- information. This so terrified him that he was only too willing
- to go along with their demand that he close down his
- organisation,
- cease publication of his journal at once, and refrain from
- telling the truth to anyone 'on his honour as an American
- citizen.'
- But did Bender really expect anyone to believe his story? His
- friends and colleagues were certainly baffled by it. One of them,
- Gray Barker, even published a sensational book, 'They Knew Too
- Much About Flying Saucers'; and Bender himself supplied an even
- stranger account in his 'Flying Saucers and the Three Men' some
- years later, in response to persistent demands for an explanation
- of what had occurred from former colleagues.
- He told an extraordinary story, involving extraterrestrial
- spaceships with bases in Antarctica, that reads like the
- far-fetched contactee dream-stuff; and it has even been suggested
- that the implausibility of Bender's story was specifically
- designed in order to throw serious UFO investigators off the
- track.
- However, believable or not, Bender's original account of the
- visit of the three strangers is of crucial interest to UFO
- investigators, for the story has been parelleled by many similar
- reports, frequently from people unlikely to have heard of Bender
- and his experiences. UFO percipients and investigators are
- apparently also liable to be visited by men in black (MIBs); and
- although most reports are from the United States, similar claims
- have come from Sweden and Italy, Britain and Mexico. Like the UFO
- phenomenon itself, MIBs span three decades, and perhaps had
- precursors in earlier centuries.
-
- VISITATIONS
-
- Like Bender's story, most later reports not only contain
- implausible details, but are also inherently illogical: in
- virtually every case, there seems on the face of it more reason
- to disbelieve that to believe. But this does not eliminate the
- mystery - it simply requires us to study it in a different light.
- For whether or not these things actually happened, the fact
- remains that they were reported; and why should so many people,
- independently and often reluctantly, report such strange and
- sinister visitations? What is more, why is it that the accounts
- are so mimilar, echoeng and in turn helping to confirm a
- persistent pattern that, if nothing else, has become one of the
- most powerful folk myths of our time?
- The archetypal MIB report runs something like this: shortly
- after a UFO sighting, the subject - he may be a witness, he may
- be an investigator on the case - receives a visit. Often it
- occurs so soon after the incident itself that no official report
- or media publication has taken place: in short, the visitors
- should not, by any normal channels, have gained access to the
- information they clearly possess - names, addresses, and details
- of the incident, as well as those involved.
- The victim is nearly always alone at the time of the visit,
- usually in his own home. The visitors, usually three in number,
- arrive in a large, black car. In America, it is most often a
- prestigious Cadillac, but seldon a recent model. Though old in
- date, however, it is likely to be immaculate in appearance and
- condition, inside and out, even having that unmistakable 'new
- car' smell. If the subject notes the registration number and
- checks it, it is invariably found to be a non-existent number.
-
-
- The visitors themselves are almost always men: only very
- rarely is one a woman, In appearance, they conform pretty closely
- to the stereotyped image of a CIA or secret service man. They
- wear dark suits, dark hats, dark ties, dark shoes and socks, but
- white shirts: and witnesses very often remark on their clean,
- immaculate turn-out, all the clothes looking as though just
- purchased.
- The visitors' faces are frequently discribed as 'vaguely
- foreign', most often 'oriental', and slanted eyes have been
- specified in many accounts. If not dark-skinned, the men are
- likely to be very heavily tanned. Sometimes there are bizarre
- touches: in one case, for instance, a man in black appeared to be
- wering bright lipstick! The MIBs are generally unsmiling and
- expressionless, their movements stiff and awkward. Their general
- demeanour is formal, cold, sinister, even menacing, and there is
- no warmth or friendliness shown, even if no outright hostility
- either. Witnesses often hint that they felt their visitors were
- not human at all.
- Some MIBs proffer evidence of identity; indeed, they
- sometimes appear in US Air Force or other uniforms. They may also
- produce identity cards; but since most people would not know a
- genuine CIA or other 'secret' service identity card if they saw
- one, this of course proves nothing at all. If they give names,
- however, these are invariably found to be false.
- The interview is sometimes an interrogation, sometimes simply
- a warning. Either way, the visitors, even though they are asking
- questions, are clearly very well-informed, with access to
- restricted information. They speak with perfect, sometimes too
- perfect, intonation and phrasing, and their language is apt to be
- reminiscent of the conventional villains of crime films.
-
- MENACING ENCOUNTERS
-
- The sinister visits almost invariably conclude with a warning
- not to tell anybody about the incident, if the subject is a UFO
- percipient, or to abandon the investigation, if he is an
- investigator. Violence is frequently threatened, too. And the
- MIBs depart as suddenly as they came.
- Most well-informed UFO enthusiasts, if asked to describe a
- typical MIB visit, would give some such account. However, a
- comparative examination of reports indicates that such 'perfect'
- MIB visits seldom occur in practice. Study of 32 of the more
- reliable cases on file reveals that many details diverge quite
- markedly from the archetypal story: there were, for instance, no
- visitors at all in four cases, only subsequent telephone calls;
- and, of the remainder, only five involved three men, two involved
- four, five involved two, while in the rest there was mention only
- of a single visitor.
- Although the appearance and behaviour of the visitors does
- seem generally to conform to the prototype, it ranges from the
- entirely natural to the totally bizarre. The car, despite the
- fact that in America it is by far the commonest means of
- transportation, is in fact mentioned in only one-third of the
- reports; and as for the picturesque details - the Cadillac, the
- antiquated model, the immaculate condition - these are, in
- practice, very much the exception. Of 22 American reports, only
- nine even include mention of a car; and of these, only three were
- Cadillacs, while only two were specified as black and only two as
- out-of-date models.
- On the other hand, such archetypal details tend to be more
- conspicuous in less reliable cases, particularly those in which
- investigators, rather than UFO percipients, are involved. The
- case that comes closest to the archetype is that of Robert
- Richardson, of Toledo, Ohio, who in July 1967 informed the Aerial
- Phenomena Research Organisation (APRO) that he had collided with
- a UFO while driving at night. Coming round a bend, he had been
- confronted by a strange object blocking the road. Unable to halt
- in time, he had hit it, though not very hard. Immediately on
- impact, the UFO vanished. Police who accompanied Richardson to
- the scene could find only his own skid marks as evidence; but on
- a later visit, Richardson himself found a small lump of metal
- which might have come from the UFO.
- Three days later, at 11 pm, two men in their twenties
- appeared at Richardson's home and questioned him for about 10
- minutes. They did not identify themselves, and Richardson - to
- his own subsequent surprise - did not ask who they were. They
- were not unfriendly, gave no warnings, and just asked questions.
- He noted that they left in a black 1953 Cadillac. The number,
- when checked, was found not yet to have been issued.
- A week later, Richardson received a second visit, from two
- different men, who arrived in a current model Dodge. They wore
- black suits and were dark-complectioned. Although one spoke
- perfect English, the second had an accent, and Richardson felt
- there was something vaguely foreign about them. At first, they
- seemed to be trying to persuade him that he had not hit anything
- at all; but then they asked for the piece of metal. When he told
- them it had gone for analysis, they threatened him: "If you want
- your wife to stay as pretty as she is, then you'd better get the
- metal back".
-
-
- The existence of the metal was known only to Richardson and
- his wife, and to two senior members of APRO. Seemingly, the only
- way the strangers could have learned of its existence would be by
- tapping either his or APRO's telephone. There was no clear
- connection between the two pairs of visitors; but what both had
- in common was access to information that was not freely and
- publicly available. Perhaps it is this that is the key to the MIB
- mystery.
-
- ************
-
- [On the page is also a boxed article titled; IN FOCUS
- THE MAN WHO SHOT A HUMANOID, reproduced
- below.]
-
- One inclement evening in November 1961, Paul Miller and three
- companions were returning home to Minot, North Dakota, after a
- hunting trip when what they could only describe as 'a luminous
- silo' landed in a nearby field. At first they thought it was a
- plane crashing, but had to revise their opinion when the 'plane'
- abruptly vanished. As the hunters drove off, the object
- reappeared and two humanoids emerged from it. Miller panicked and
- fired at one of the creatures, apparently wounding it. The other
- hunters immediately fled.
- On their way back to Minot, all of them experienced a blackout
- and 'lost' three hours. Terrified, they decided not to report the
- incident to anyone. Yet the next morning, when Miller reported
- to work (in an Air Force office), three men in black arrived.
- They said they were government officials - but showed no
- credentials - and remarked unpleasantly that they hoped Miller
- was 'telling the truth' about the UFO. How did they know about
- it? 'We have a report,' they said vaguely.
- 'They seemed to know everthing about me; where I worked, my
- name, everthing else,' Miller said. They also asked questions
- about his experiences as if they already knew the answers. Miller
- did not dare tell his story for several years.
-
- *****End*****
-
-